Custom writings on Researching the media
// June 20th, 2012 // No Comments » // Free essays
In reading (viewing) frequency, a respondent is asked the question “How many of the last N numbers/programs have you read/seen?” Replying to the question, the respondent has to constantly refer to his memory. Naturally, by the end of the interview his mind dulled, and he starts making mistakes. Therefore, the questionnaire has to be shorter; a variety of ways should be used to facilitate its filling; interviewers should ensure that the questionnaire is filled correctly. However, this technique allows covering quite a large period of time, which is not tied to the time the publication appeared in sale or the TV/radio show got on the air (Traudt 2005).
In practice, combined methods are also frequently used, when the questionnaire contains both, the questions on recent reading and reading frequency. The advantages of this technique are its relative cheapness and the possibility to approach specific target groups.
The method of focus groups involves a panel discussion led by a specialist (moderator). The main advantage of this method is the possibility to quickly gain so-called depth information in a small group of respondents. The essence of the method lies in the fact that respondents’ attention is focused on the researched topic in order to determine their attitude to a given problem, find out the motivation of certain actions.
Focus group research is an effective tool helping to identify the peculiarities of audience’s perception of information materials and information channels; to understand the reasons for the formation of assessments and opinions of recipients of informational influence. Focus group discussion allows understanding the peculiarities of perception of information by people, on which it is directed. This method helps to identify the actual content of perceptual and motivational aspects of the information perception, quality parameters of informational influence on people’s psyche (Bates 2005).
The essence of this method for the analysis of informational impact of the media is that the focus group interview is taking place in the form of discussion and is directed on obtainment of subjective impressions of its members on their perception of information from the media products. This makes it possible to penetrate into the inner world of values of the panellists, to understand the motivation of their behavior ratings. Focused interview unites clarifying a specific set of issues with the free form of discussion.
In contrast to other methods giving an idea about the market as a whole, specialized studies provide an opportunity to analyze some of its components in detail: study preferences of audiences, measure the strength of brands among certain social groups, test media products, analyze the effectiveness of advertising campaigns, etc. This information can be used for addressing current marketing and editorial tasks and for making strategic decisions.
In addition, this method allows the client to monitor the progress of the study himself and draw appropriate conclusions. In contrast to quantitative research methods (for example, a sociological survey) which give the answer to the questions “Who?” and “How much?”, focus group method answers questions like “In which way?” and “Why?” (Bates 2005).
The second peculiarity of focus group is the way of forming a sampling and of data collection methods. In a quantitative study, the basic method is the survey (personal, telephone survey), in which respondents presenting a particular category of consumers are questioned in a concrete scheme (the questionnaire). In a focus group, depth group interview techniques are applied allowing researchers to obtain the information, which is not lying on the surface, but showing a wide range of attitudes (Bates 2005; Murray 2003).
Focus group is a subjective method of research (as opposed to surveys). The meaning of this method is that during the panel discussion the respondent is involved into the communication with people of his own kind. Therefore, the psychological barriers separating interviewer and interviewee in a survey are removed much more efficiently; therefore, emotional reactions are much brighter (Bates 2005). Focus groups are more suitable for a wide range of reactions, opinions and attitudes, which are more or less representative with respect to the audience under research. An important advantage of panel discussions is the manifestation of poorly realized attitudes that become conscious in the communication process. (more…)




