Customized essay on The Effect of Globalization on Contemporary Art
Certainly, it is only a piece of vast picture that brings with itself globalization. The same as mobility of people evens between itself countries and cultures, does mobility of commodities. In television industry it is well known fact that most easy to sale in most countries so-called «films of action», «thrillers». Heroism, excitation and violence, not too differentiate in different cultures. Comedies, with their nuances and specific hints it is much difficult to sell abroad. A global cinema market pushes slightly to that, to make anymore «thrillers», than comedies, for example. Moreover, comedies must be simple, as hardness complication of language to translate. All of it is not instrumental in upgrading films. The same situation we can see also in musical industry, as musicians offer the products of western audience, which does not have deep understanding of music, but aspires to aesthetic pleasure. Globalization, though favor the development of musical industry, often contains the seed of subsequent decomposition, pushing slightly creators to lowering of quality of their creations, to conquer a mass market.
Thus, taking into account all above stated it is possible to conclude that globalization is destroying the diversity of art, because it simplified it and take away national identity. In time of globalization many countries moving towards an international style which does not conform to the diversity of human culture, because every nation creates and saves the culture as character of realization of the right. Nation, as cultural reality, proves in different spheres, which a consuetude, orientation of will, valued orientation, language, written language, art, poetry, legal proceeding, are, religion et cetera. Nation must see the higher function in existence of nation as such. It always must care of strengthening of sovereignty of the state. The maintenance of originality and its strengthening, mainly, depends on activity of internal forces and from the exposure of national internal energy. A culture of community is not simple the sum of cultures of individuals, it is super individual and is an aggregate of values, creative products and standards of conduct of community of people. A culture is the unique force, forming a man as member of community.
The culture of maintenance of national features becomes richer, if it co-operates with many people of the world, but it should be wise cooperation with aim to increase own culture but not to destroy it. For national consciousness the own vital mode of nation is perceived not only as original, only to it inherent method of registration of life, but also as superiority in relation to other cultures. For national consciousness hardness of culture and way of life is comprehended as overcoming of extremity. Every representative of nation sees overcoming of own empiric extremity in immortality of national culture, where future generations will save the way of life, inherent this culture, as it is done by contemporaries and as it was done by ancestors. Original sense which constantly accompanies national consciousness, consciousness of originality of own nation and its differences from other nations is named national sense. The representatives of one nation differ from representatives other by a physical type, their consuetudes, type of conduct and domestic skills, are different. In the process of historical development nation produces certain presentations and valued orientation. I think that we should protect own culture from the negative influence of globalization, because exactly we create contemporary art and culture and will be continuation of our national identity or the result of globalization depend on from our activity in this area.
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Bhagwati, Jagdish. In Defense of Globalization. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Dallmayr, Fred. Alternative Visions: Paths in the Global Village. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
Falk, Richard. Predatory Globalization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1999.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw Hill, 1992.
Robertson, R. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Cultur. London: Sage, 1994.
Scheuerman, William E. Liberal Democracy and the Social Acceleration of Time. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2004.
Spalding, Julian. The Eclipse of Art: Tackling the Crisis in Art Today. Prestel Publishing, 2003.
Timms, Peter. What’s Wrong with Contemporary Art? UNSW Press, 2004.
Tomlinson, John. Globalization and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1999.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.